Talk:Incredible Characters Wiki

These wikis are becaming pointless

Yet fails to provide proof that it should be deleted You need to have a super good reason for this which you don't because you lack proof this wiki should be sinked.

Can you please stop demanding that the Characters Wikis be deleted? They're not going anywhere, and they've been getting a lot better since 2022, so I ask that you stop trying to force us to delete them.

I got ignored last time

I only joined the wiki because some of the pages really annoyed me, especially Sakura Kinomoto's page acting like she's an ultra-masculine tomboy. That is pretty gross mischaracterization right there.

Problems with the wiki:

• A very immature environment and vibe, given that almost all of the characters on here are from American kids cartoons. The custom headers are also super corny.
  • The worst offenders have to be SpongeBob, The Loud House, Friendship is Magic, Fairly OddParents, Numberblocks or whatever the hell it's called, Thomas the Tank Engine, Baby Einstein, SML, and SMG4. Seriously, how do characters like L Lawliet, Michael Myers, Chucky, Light Yagami, Haruhi Suzumiya, James Bond, Atticus Finch, Lain Iwakura, Johan Liebert, Kamina, Roy Mustang, Osaka (Azumanga Daioh), Lum, Vash the Stampede, Forrest Gump, Hannibal Lecter, Norman Bates, Tyler Durden, and Patrick Bateman not have pages on here, but almost every character from The Loud House does? I'm not saying any of you have to make those specific pages (I was planning on making them myself when I gain the ability to make pages), but still.
  • Almost all of the characters on the main page, with some exceptions like Eren and Rick, are from western cartoons targeted at little kids and cartoony video games (Sonic, Mario, Spyro, etc) I'm not saying that it's bad to like these things or that they should be removed, but it does the show the wiki's immaturity and bias.
• Not enough anime, live-action, (mature) video game, and adult animated characters.
• Extremely weak pointers on some of the pages, especially Kat & Ana.
• Plagiarism from other sites.
• Overusage of "fLaNdErIzEd"
• Lies and mischaracterization. For example, as I said above, the wiki characterizing the incredibly feminine and benevolent Sakura Kinomoto as a brash tomboy. It's okay to be girly, you know. It makes the wiki seem like it has a tomboy fetish and a hatred for femininity. Also the Walter White page acts like he's a humble man who cares about his family. The last part might have been true at first, but the entire damn show is about his descent into evil.
• Multiple quotes at the top of pages make them hard to read and liable to crashing. Example: SpongeBob's page. (side note: "ScumBob" seriously? you will never be PIEGUYRULZ. Stop trying to be like him and other caustic cartoon reviewers)
• The page titles saying things like "XYZ Character (seasons 3-8) or some shit like that is confusing and clunky.

Here's what I propose to fix the wiki:

• Less immaturity, more, uh, sophistication.
• Less western animated characters from kids shows, more characters from anime, live-action, violent video games, literature, and adult shows.
• Ditch the custom headers.
• No mischaracterization or dishonesty about the characters in the pages. It seems like some of you have never even watched the shows some characters are from.
• No Enterbots or PhantomStrider wannabes.
• Make us more distinct from the (ugh) "reception wikis"
• MORE QUALITY CONTROL! Seriously, the fact that Monokuma has more bad pointers than good on his page shows the lack of quality control.
• "Quotes" section for each character.
• Remove the "Eras" from the titles of some pages.

Point one is fine point two is also fine to make sure that this wiki doesn't get bloated with kids stuff. disagree with point 3 having the same headers like good and bad quality's just looks boring and basic while lacking creativity. Point 4 is fine also same with point 5,6,7. Points 8 and 9 I disagree with not every character should have a quote section plus some eras are used to classified points of time where a character was good.

I listened to you about the Kat & Ana page.

It was much better even though its a bot and auto command because one it nukes users that don't need to exist on this wiki when it hits like ones that have true bad faith blanking for example character they personaly hate on this wiki. If your just a user that comes on this wiki only to do attempted nuking with vandalism, being a huge jerk to others around you, disrespecting admins while getting into unneeded wars with them, and more rule breaking and COC violations. Then You have no purpose to be on this wiki then to be looked at as an annoyance that gets thrown into the banland quickly and been given reasons like "clearly not here to help this wiki" as their reason to ban land. Like seriously Kristoffen, JamieRules123, and abigblueworld are perfect examples of who not to be. To be short don't BAD FAITH ON THIS WIKI AT ALL.

Then how about the other admins in that case so that vandals stop annoying and bloating the user talks of the other admins?

Yeah, my talk page just had to be protected because of those nonstop socks, it didn't just happen on the Characters wikis, it happened on the music wikis too (Horrible and Excellent Music Wiki, where I am active on the latter).

It should be that way because no admin should have to deal with such annoying minor issues from new users that only come in this wiki for bad faith while also bloating user talks on the admin pages for no reason but to bomb. So I agree with the CrazySpruiker2001 choice to protect the user talk as this will help a lot more so that users can talk to admins user talks when they earn the rights to them in 4 days and 10 edits.

Yeah, and I thanked him for that, because it saves me from having to deal with those annoying socks that just joined a wiki (that aren't autoconfirmed), just so they can do this annoying crap for no reason other than clout.

I just want to know what will happen from now on due to this event.

I want to be the admin and leader.

once again, no, you can't qualify to be one, because you already proved that you are not ready and responsible enough to be one, you even unblocked users who didn't deserve to be unblocked, especially JamieRules123 (what's also worse is that dealing with his stay before was a lot harder, and because of you, he's been given a final chance (that he literally just blew and now he's permanently gone)), and it also doesn't help that you were falsely given admin rights, so SSK definitely had to take them away.

I agree with this statement mariobobfan action was completely thrown out the window even though admins were nice enough to let this action slide until I reported him for sending me a foe request. Let's not mention the fact mariobobfan also almost got into edit wars with a user called wikiti98. Also mariobobfan should stop begging for admin rights which only proves that he isn't ready for admin even more.

Yep. On top of this, there were also times (two times from what I saw on the sister wiki) where MarioBobFan was asking SSK to give his admin rights back, despite how the latter had every right to take the former's rights away for good reasons, which suggests that MarioBobFan is unworthy to be an admin, even more.

I know a lot of that. I also have a lot of more edits than users on the sister wiki, which is especially saying something and is saying a lot.

Quantity doesn't mean better edits it just means more plus that doesn't excuse the fact you did those things. Begging for admin is not a good action it only proofs why you shouldn't have it. Plus you were almost getting into edit wars with wikiti98 about stuff you didn't agree with him.

I don't think your "qualified" as judging on your history you been known to edit war pages you don't agree with like for example adding slightly-redeemed to pages when it doesn't even exist. Not to mention when you got admin by accident not only did you mess it up by unblocking people that didn't deserve unblocking in the first place. You also are an editor that doesn't add many reasons to their edits. And begging for admin back when you didn't deserve it shows that your not fit for the job in my opinion.

I will.

I'd be willing to make one if not. I'd like to discuss wiki-related topics on Discord.

This is a questions that other users can answer so I can know what some think.

Nearly every page I visit has irrelevant and vague categories, poor formatting and grammar, highly subjective pointers, etc.

Also is this a wiki for well-written characters or a wiki for protagonists? It's not made very clear.

Plus this wiki has a sister If you haven't known about that which is important if you know what the rules state.

Btw the protagonists are not the only ones on this wiki as bowser is a great example of the antagonists being well written.

@Collei It's a wiki for characters that are well-written and well-like by the general consensus of critics and audiences, whether they're protagonists or even antagonists.

I see, thanks

Btw want to know a fact from the sister wiki.

its for well written as this wiki is meant to be for characters who are well written, likable, and don't have anything that annoys the audience while also being characters that inspiring and having impact.

He is neither a good nor likable character and many people find him annoying (me included). I saw that someone was trying to start a page on him here and I'd appreciate if you would delete the Bunga page on this Wiki and add him to Loathsome Characters Wiki instead.

Too late. He already has a page here. What I can do, though, is make a page for him for season 3 (on LCW, ofc).

They are a pretty iconic duo, and in my opinion, they are slightly superior to Arthur and Buster (go ahead, shoot at me).

All in favor of the idea?

I guess I'm in favor.

Ok